Members
Subscribe

1. Log in

2. Click on the Community Blog page

3. Click on your name on the top right of the screen

4. Click on Subscribe to Page Updates to receive email notifications of new blog posts

Search

RSS

Entries in LILAC 2009 (6)

Monday
Apr272009

LILAC 2009: Information literacy and emerging technology (discussion in Second Life event)

Couple of blog postings that people might be interested in that relate to an Infolit iSchool Second Life event on 23rd April:

  1. Information Literacy meets Library 2.0 Peter Godwin and Jo Parker


Impressions from the LILAC (information literacy) conference Vicki Cormie talking about Andrew Walsh's session on using mobiles, Marshall Dozier talking about Peter Godwin's, which also focused on mobiles.

2. Information Literacy Weblog Sheila Webber

Mobile Phones and a New Zealand study - Twiss, T. (2008) Ubiquitous information: An eFellow report on the use of mobile phones in classrooms to foster information literacy. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9507014/Toni-Twiss-Ubiquitous-Information
Wednesday
Apr222009

Lilac 2009 Information Literacy as a habit of learning

I reported in my first posting on LILAC 2009 about Moira Bent and Elizabeth Stockdale's presentation Integrating Information Literacy as a habit of learning: Assessing the impact of a golden thread of IL in the curriculum  for anyone who is interested the presentation is now on slideshare.
Monday
Apr202009

LILAC 2009: Information literacy and emerging technology 

I only managed to attend one of the sesions on emerging technology Are we sharing our toys in the sandpit? A discussion on issues surrounding the re-use and re-purposing of electronic information literacy learning objects in the UK. where there emerged lots of the issues surrounding this area and the possiblity of interested parties coming together.

The use of mobile technology got people talking
If they won't turn them off, we might as well use them. Using mobile ‘phones in information skills sessions Andrew Walsh  and Information Literacy meets the Mobile Web - Peter Godwin (see Vicki Owen's posting about both these sessions).

Other sessions covered various aspects of Web 2.00 including Second Life Aspects of information literacy in virtual worlds - Sheila Webber (Sheffield University Department of Information Studies), Vicki Cormie (St Andrews University Library), Lyn Parker (Sheffield University Library) and Marshall Dozier & Denny Colledge (Edinburgh University Library). The presenters all have experience of teaching and/or supporting teaching on their universities’ Second Life islands (Sheffield’s Infolit iSchool, Edinburgh’s Vue and St Andrews’ Minerva Island).

One of the key note speakers Melissa Highton Head of the Learning Technologies Group (LTG) at University of Oxford talked about the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge using iTunes U to record one off experiences (lectures). She also talked about Digital Literacy which she said there was no definition as yet (I think she menat agreed definition) and asked who would shape a Digital Literacy Framework. Surprisingly she didn't mention the earlier work of Alan Martin and the DigEuLit Project - A European framework for Digital Literacy. She stated that learners need to aquire an increasingly complex range of skills for effective lifelong learning including information literacy and e-learning skills, and with the emergence of new technologies we all need to.
Friday
Apr172009

Some thoughts on LILAC 09 

 


This year’s LILAC, held at Cardiff, was yet another administrative triumph for the organising committee with all the components of a successful international conference present including two superb evening events. I shall certainly be going back to Caerphilly Castle again. With the 5th year completed a pattern is now established with the continuing predominance of HE, both in attendees and presentations. This is not surprising, given that HE is the library sector where there is most interest and activity in R&D and also funding to support it. There is interest, but less time, money and resources generally in schools but there were presentations about or relating to schools which is a welcome development. It is also good to see university libraries working with schools and this is clearly well established in a number of cities now as the discussion following Michelle Schneider’s presentation showed. There was a much less about the workplace and taking the IL message to supportive non ‘library’ client groups. There was nothing directly on media literacy and only one presentation on health literacy which attracted a disappointingly small audience for such an important subject. The range of sources people use to find information about weight issues was interesting as ‘librarianly’ type sources cam about two thirds way down the list. In view of our work I find this unsurprising and no doubt Christopher Walker would be of the same opinion, given that he has found that parents of young children’s principal source of information is the TV programme, 'Supernanny'.


There is no doubt that the programme was extremely full, perhaps too full, although this may be unavoidable as the organisers would not want to disappoint any applicants unnecessarily.  However the conference has been running for five years now and perhaps it is time to stand back and take stock. As director of the Scottish Information Literacy Project I have tried to move away from a concentration on models based on traditional information sources and to some extent to move away from a culture of librarians talking to librarians in favour of making partnerships and contacts with supportive organisations outside the library world. This includes employers’ organisations, skills bodies and trade unions. In a real sense we should be talking to anyone but librarians and promoting IL as an essential career choice and management skill, a CPD skill, a workplace decision making and lifelong skill, a civil right and a skill to support leisure. Perhaps next year there should be some longer reflective sessions about what IL is really for and where it ought to go in the 21st century. Speakers from outside the profession would be a good idea although such people are still not very common.  As usual it is easier to pose the questions than produce the answers.


Christine has reported on a number of specific sessions and like her I found Leslie Burger’s presentation inspiring because she is a public librarian with a cross sectoral, skills perspective which is just what we need.


Among the parallel sessions the one I will remember most is not a worthily scholarly presentation but Alison Beswick and Claire Taylor, two students at Sheffield University who spoke about ‘The reality of information literacy: Does Joe Student actually understand what’s going on’. Although I have sat through many presentations about what students need and what they should get this is the first time I have ever seen actual students giving their perspective on what IL is. It was a naïve piece of work in the very best sense of the word, consisting largely of a video of interviews with students, apparently selected at random, and asking them informally for their perspective on IL. Having in the past been involved in service evaluation work I am always struck how muted the voice of the learner/user is in information skills teaching and learning and more presentations along these lines would be welcome, especially supported by unequivocal evidence of value and impact. A theme for next year, perhaps? I also found Wendy Beautyman’s talk on children’s’ information seeking behaviour interesting. She is obviously very good with children and there should be interesting results but we will have to wait for another day to hear them.


As usual I missed some presentations which looked interesting such as Marsha Miller and Susan Frey on the techno senior.




Cutting the 5th anniversary cake Cutting the 5th anniversary cake
Thursday
Apr162009

LILAC 2009: information literacy: staff development and transition from school to HE 

Although Linda Jones and Greta Figgens (University of Portsmouth) 'Destination information!: taking staff on an information literacy journey' was about library staff development some of the resulting activities did include transition for new students to HE.

Destination Information is the name of a successful staff development day held to introduce staff to information literacy (IL) and make them aware of some of the activity around IL - their own role in promoting IL and their own IL skills. The topic used was planning a holiday and the pre-selected teams had to present their plan as a poster and handout, the idea being to replicate the students’ experience. Interestingly the staff did behave like students in the strategies they employed and not those of their profession. The day was very successful  with an increase in the uptake of staff development particularly among the library para-professional staff, some of whom have gone on to be use blogs for their NVQs. They also talked about some initiatives including:


 


·  a University wide interactive website Prepup (includes: course information; virtual tours; student and tutor videos; useful academic development materials) to engage students pre-entry to the university


· taking part in Freshers Fair using a Pirate theme which attracted students to their stand


· using a specifically designed Fortune Teller (see short video below) to demonstrate how randomly students find information; also did one for staff / lecturers for a teaching and learning event – novel. 



 

 


The wonderful thing is that the staff development event had been inspired by a session at last years LILAC – ‘Information Literacy at the Issue / Service desk’ (Hannah Hauxwell, University of the West of England). This demonstrates what conferences like LILAC are all about sharing good ideas and inspiring people.


Short video of University of Portsmouth's Library Fortune Teller